The Growing Season and Its Role in Producing Mature Deer and Antler Development

Introduction

The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is one of the most studied and intensively managed game species in North America. While age and genetics are critical factors in determining mature body condition and antler potential, the quality and duration of the growing season play an equally vital role in shaping physical development and antler expression. The availability of highly digestible forage during spring and summer directly influences somatic growth, fat accumulation, velvet antler production, and hormonal processes such as testosterone synthesis and mineralization of pedicles (Strickland and Demarais, 2006; Bubenik, 1990).

Seasonal Nutrition and Vegetation Phenology

White-tailed deer are adapted to seasonal environments and synchronize their growth and reproductive cycles with changing resource availability. The spring flush of vegetation brings a surge in crude protein and digestible energy, both of which are necessary for antlerogenesis (Verme and Ullrey, 1984). Antler growth typically begins in April and continues into August, aligning with the period when plant quality is highest and day length increases (Ditchkoff et al., 2001). During this phase, bucks allocate resources to antler growth, and under optimal conditions, velvet antlers can grow more than two centimeters per day (Goss, 1983).

High-protein forbs and browse, especially species that exceed sixteen percent crude protein, are essential for maximum antler expression (French et al., 1956; Jenks et al., 1996). If nutritional requirements are not met due to habitat limitations, drought conditions, or overbrowsing, antler development is compromised regardless of genetic potential (Warren et al., 2006).

Hormonal Regulation and Physiological Response

Photoperiodic cues during the growing season activate the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, stimulating the secretion of testosterone which is essential for the mineralization and hardening of antlers (Bubenik, 1990). Adequate nutrition during this time supports the production of insulin-like growth factor 1 and other anabolic hormones that work together to drive antler growth and tissue repair (Price et al., 2005).

Body condition at the end of the growing season is also a reliable predictor of overwinter survival and future reproductive output. Bucks in better condition exhibit larger antler mass, more symmetry, and increased tine length in subsequent years. This is most evident in mature bucks over three and a half years of age (Strickland et al., 2008).

Geographic Variation in Growing Season Dynamics

The duration and quality of the growing season vary widely across North America. Northern regions such as the upper Midwest and Canada experience shorter growing seasons, which compress the window for antler development and fat accumulation. These conditions often lead to lower antler scores when compared to regions with longer growing periods (Demarais et al., 2000). In arid regions such as Texas and the southern plains, rainfall timing is more influential than temperature and can significantly affect the availability of quality forage during key antler growth periods (Cook et al., 2004).

This variability has led to a wide range of land management practices aimed at increasing the effectiveness of the growing season. These include prescribed burning, rotational grazing, native habitat restoration, and the use of supplemental food plots that provide high-quality forage during late spring and early summer (Harper et al., 2000; Hewitt, 2011).

Management Implications

For wildlife managers and landowners focused on producing high-quality deer, understanding the link between growing season dynamics and antler development is essential. Nutritional bottlenecks during spring and summer can limit antler potential for an entire cohort. These effects can carry over into the fall breeding season and influence recruitment and herd structure.

Effective management must include strategies that increase forage quality and availability during the critical April through August period. Practices such as managing plant succession, reducing deer density to match habitat carrying capacity, and enhancing the diversity of high-protein plant species can dramatically influence the physical expression and health of a deer herd. Integrating habitat improvement with age-structure management offers the best opportunity to maximize the genetic potential of white-tailed deer.

References

Bubenik, G. A. (1990). Epigenetic control of antler growth. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Supplement 4, 50–61.

Cook, R. C., Cook, J. G., & Mech, L. D. (2004). Nutritional condition of northern Yellowstone elk. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68(4), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[106:NCONYE]2.0.CO;2

Demarais, S., Strickland, B. K., & Jacobson, H. A. (2000). The impact of nutritional variation on antler development in white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(3), 592–601.

Ditchkoff, S. S., Lochmiller, R. L., Masters, R. E., Starry, W. R., & Leslie, D. M. (2001). Does fluctuating asymmetry of antlers in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) follow patterns predicted for sexually selected traits? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268(1467), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1579

French, C. E., McEwen, L. C., Magruder, N. D., Ingram, R. H., & Swift, R. W. (1956). Nutrient requirements for growth and antler development in the white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 20(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797076

Goss, R. J. (1983). Deer antlers: Regeneration, function and evolution. Academic Press.

Harper, C. A., Miller, B. K., & Wheaton, J. E. (2000). Managing early successional plant communities for wildlife in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(2), 423–430.

Hewitt, D. G. (Ed.). (2011). Biology and management of white-tailed deer. CRC Press.

Jenks, J. A., Leslie, D. M., & Lochmiller, R. L. (1996). Effects of climate and nutrition on antler characteristics in white-tailed deer in Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 76, 23–30.

Price, J. S., Faucheux, C., Allen, S., Althnaian, T., & Mount, J. G. (2005). Deer antlers: A zoological model of mammalian appendage regeneration. Frontiers in Bioscience, 10, 438–452. https://doi.org/10.2741/1539

Strickland, B. K., & Demarais, S. (2006). Influence of landscape composition and structure on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) antler size in Mississippi. American Midland Naturalist, 156(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2006)156[211:IOLCAS]2.0.CO;2

Strickland, B. K., Demarais, S., & Miller, K. V. (2008). White-tailed deer reproduction and antler growth in relation to population density and habitat quality. Southeastern Naturalist, 7(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2008)7[103:WDRAAG]2.0.CO;2

Verme, L. J., & Ullrey, D. E. (1984). Physiology and nutrition. In L. K. Halls (Ed.), White-tailed deer: Ecology and management (pp. 91–118). Stackpole Books.

Warren, R. J., Conner, M. C., & Miller, K. V. (2006). Management implications of white-tailed deer seasonal physiology. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(2), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[564:MIOWDS]2.0.CO;2